Pain relief in plantar fasciitis: phonophoresis versus iontophoresis in guards: a pilot study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2026-11(1).02

Keywords:

Diclofenac gel, Non-invasive physiotherapy, Heel pain, Security personnel, Transdermal drug delivery

Abstract

Purpose. Plantar fasciitis is a leading cause of heel pain, particularly among individuals engaged in prolonged standing and walking occupations such as security guards. It is now understood as a degenerative fasciosis of the plantar fascia rather than a purely inflammatory condition, involving collagen disorganization and microtrauma at the medial calcaneal 26 management due to their safety and clinical feasibility. Phonophoresis and iontophoresis are commonly used transdermal drug delivery modalities that enhance the local effects of topical agents such as diclofenac through ultrasonic energy and low-intensity electrical currents, respectively. Both techniques aim to provide targeted pain relief while minimizing systemic side effects. Additionally, Muscle Energy Techniques (MET) may further improve outcomes by enhancing flexibility, reducing muscle tightness, and optimizing foot biomechanics. However, evidence comparing the relative effectiveness of phonophoresis and iontophoresis, particularly when combined with MET in occupationally active populations, remains limited. This study, therefore, seeks to address this gap by comparing their effects on pain and quality of life in middle-aged security guards with plantar fasciitis. Objective: to determine Pain Relief in Plantar Fasciitis: Phonophoresis versus Iontophoresis in Guards.

Material & Methods. Thirty security guards with clinically diagnosed bilateral plantar fasciitis were recruited using convenience sampling and randomly allocated into two equal groups in a single-blinded manner using an odd–even allocation method. Group A received MET combined with phonophoresis using diclofenac potassium 6% gel, while Group B received MET combined with iontophoresis using diclofenac potassium 6% gel. Both interventions were administered daily for four weeks under physiotherapist's supervision. Pain intensity, foot function, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and post-intervention using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire, respectively. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0. (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and as data were normally distributed, parametric tests were applied. Within-group changes were analyzed using paired t-tests, and between-group differences were evaluated using independent samples t-tests. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results. Thirty participants were equally allocated to the phonophoresis + MET group (Group A, n=15) and the iontophoresis + MET group (Group B, n=15). Baseline demographic characteristics and pre-treatment outcome measures were comparable between groups (p>0.05). Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements in pain (VAS), foot function (FFI), and quality of life (SF-36) following the 4-week intervention (p<0.001). However, post-intervention comparisons revealed significantly greater improvements in Group A compared with Group B across all primary and secondary outcomes. Group A showed a larger reduction in VAS scores (2.58±1.07 vs. 4.75±1.48; p<0.001) and markedly lower post-treatment FFI pain, disability, and activity limitation scores (p<0.001 for all). Quality-of-life outcomes also favored Group A, with greater percentage improvements across all SF-36 domains, particularly physical health limitation and physical functioning. These findings indicate that diclofenac potassium phonophoresis combined with MET was more effective than iontophoresis with MET in reducing pain, improving foot function, and enhancing quality of life in patients with plantar fasciitis.

Conclusions. Diclofenac potassium phonophoresis combined with muscle energy techniques appears to be more effective than iontophoresis in reducing pain and improving foot function and quality of life in middle-aged individuals with plantar fasciitis, particularly those exposed to prolonged occupational standing. The superior improvements observed across physical, emotional, and functional domains support phonophoresis as a promising, non-invasive adjunct in the conservative management of chronic heel pain. Further large-scale, long-term randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings and optimize treatment protocols for occupational populations.

References

Mundhava A. Effect of muscle energy technique versus ischemic compression on pain and disability in patients with plantar fasciitis. Int J Physiol Nutr Phys Educ. 2020;5(2):165-9. https://bit.ly/3MQA9fs

Kaur J, Bhatia G. Effect of phonophoresis and myofascial release in plantar fasciitis. Nat J Clin Orthop. 2021;5(3):01-3. https://doi.org/10.33545/orthor.2021.v5.i3a.281

Biz C, Fan C. Anatomy of the plantar fascia. In: Fascia: the tensional network of the human body. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2021. p. 348. https://bit.ly/4tWpksQ

Osborne HR, Allison GT. Treatment of plantar fasciitis by LowDye taping and iontophoresis: short-term results of a double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled clinical trial of dexamethasone and acetic acid. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(6):545-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.021758

Buchanan BK, Sina RE, Kushner D. Plantar fasciitis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431073/

Antohe BA, Alshana O, Uysal HŞ, Rață M, Iacob GS, Panaet EA. Effects of myofascial release techniques on joint range of motion of athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sports (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(5):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12050132

Sarkar B, Mangalam AK, Sahay P. Efficacy of muscle energy technique as compared to myofascial trigger point release in chronic plantar fasciitis: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Health Sci Res. 2018;8(6):128-36. https://bit.ly/4sagaas

Thompson J, Saini S, Reb C, Daniel J. Diagnosis and management of plantar fasciitis. J Osteopath Med. 2014;114(12):900-1. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2014.177

Lee WC, Wong WY, Kung E, Leung AK. Effectiveness of adjustable dorsiflexion night splint in combination with accommodative foot orthosis on plantar fasciitis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(10):1557-64. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.09.0181

Urse GN. Plantar fasciitis: A review. Osteopathic Family Physician. 2012 May 1;4(3):68-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osfp.2011.10.003

Çağlar Okur S, Aydın A. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with custom foot orthotics in plantar fasciitis treatment: a prospective randomized one-year follow-up study. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2019;19(2):178-86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31186388/

Grieve R, Palmer S. Physiotherapy for plantar fasciitis: a UK-wide survey of current practice. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(2):193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.02.002

Boob MA Jr, Phansopkar P, Somaiya KJ. Physiotherapeutic interventions for individuals suffering from plantar fasciitis: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023 Jul 31;15(7):e42740. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42740

Bolgla LA, Malone TR. Plantar fasciitis and the windlass mechanism: a biomechanical link to clinical practice. J Athl Train. 2004;39(1):77-82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC385265/

Tseng WC, Chen YC, Lee TM, Chen WS. Plantar fasciitis: an updated review. J Med Ultrasound. 2023 Oct 6;31(4):268-74. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmu.jmu_2_23

Dunning J, Butts R, Henry N et al. Electrical dry needling as an adjunct to exercise, manual therapy and ultrasound for plantar fasciitis: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205405

Schuster R, Younesi F, Ezzo M, Hinz B. The role of myofibroblasts in physiological and pathological tissue repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2023 Jan 3;15(1):a041231. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041231

Khired Z, Najmi MH, Akkur AA, Mashhour MA, Bakri KA. The prevalence and risk factors of plantar fasciitis amongst the population of Jazan. Cureus. 2022 Sep 21;14(9):e29434. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29434

Lim AT, How CH, Tan B. Management of plantar fasciitis in the outpatient setting. Singapore Med J. 2016;57(4):168-71. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2016069

Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(5):626-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008

Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4(4):287-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.185

Nageswari C, Meena N, Gupta S, Thillaieaswaran B. Effect of Pilates exercises on pain, endurance, quality-of-life, and disability in postmenopausal women with low back pain. Musculoskeletal Care. 2025;23(1):e70071. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70071

Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):561-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4

McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006

Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002

Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Mazza J, Stuck RM. A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised. J Foot Ankle Res. 2013 Feb 1;6(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-5

Byl NN. The use of ultrasound as an enhancer for transcutaneous drug delivery: phonophoresis. Phys Ther. 1995;75(6):539-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/75.6.539

Rigby JH, Draper DO, Johnson AW, Myrer JW, Eggett DL, Mack GW. The time course of dexamethasone delivery using iontophoresis through human skin, measured via microdialysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(3):190-7. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5308

Robertson VJ, Baker KG. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies. J Womens Health Phys Ther. 2010;34(3):99-110. https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0b013e318200897a

Zhang K, Wang T, Huang X et al. Ultrasound-mediated nanomaterials for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Ultrason Sonochem. 2025;114:107270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107270

Watson T. The role of electrotherapy in contemporary physiotherapy practice. Man Ther. 2000;5(3):132-41. https://doi.org/10.1054/math.2000.0363

Sheikh NK, Dua A. Iontophoresis analgesic medications. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553090/

Costello CT, Jeske AH. Iontophoresis: applications in transdermal medication delivery. Phys Ther. 1995;75(6):554-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/75.6.554

Chaitow L. Muscle energy techniques. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.

Smith M, Fryer G. A comparison of two muscle energy techniques for increasing flexibility of the hamstring muscle group. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008;12(4):312-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.06.011

Benedetti F. Mechanisms of placebo and placebo-related effects across diseases and treatments. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:33-60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094711

Tracey I. Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans. Nat Med. 2010;16(11):1277-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2229

Ay S, Doğan SK, Evcik D, Başer OC. Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31(9):1203-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1419-0

Luksurapan W, Boonhong J. Effects of phonophoresis of piroxicam and ultrasound on symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(2):250-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.025

Gross IP, Lima AL, Sá-Barreto LL, Gelfuso GM, Cunha-Filho M. Recent advances in cutaneous drug delivery by iontophoresis. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020;17(3):321-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2025.2490267

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Bhushan, A., Gupta, S., Vajrala, K. R., Fatima, A., & Singh, N. (2026). Pain relief in plantar fasciitis: phonophoresis versus iontophoresis in guards: a pilot study. Physical Rehabilitation and Recreational Health Technologies, 11(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2026-11(1).02

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Article