Prediction of quality of life parameters among university students for the optimization of health-enhancing recreational programs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2025-10(5).01

Keywords:

physical activity, machine learning, quality of life, students, model, safety, Ukraine

Abstract

Purpose. The present study sought to construct and empirically test predictive models of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a cohort of Ukrainian university students. The models incorporated behavioural patterns, psychosocial factors, and safety-related perceptions as key determinants. By doing so, the research aimed to generate evidence-based insights that could inform the development of more effective, context-sensitive recreational and health-promotion programs tailored to the challenges of studying and living under wartime conditions.

Material & Methods. The study involved 172 students (48.8% male, 51.2% female; aged 18–25 years) enrolled in Ukrainian higher education institutions. Data collection included standardized questionnaires: the SF-36 Health Survey (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Short Form (IPAQ-SF), the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), and the Service Quality Assessment Scale (SQAS) adapted to wartime conditions. Factor analysis identified two main domains («Motivation» and «Constraints»), and additional variables such as time and financial limitations were analysed separately. Predictive modelling was conducted using Gradient Boosting Trees (GBT) and Random Forest (RF) methods. Model performance was evaluated with MAE, RMSE, and MAPE metrics.

Results. The models demonstrated distinct predictive capacities for physical and mental components of HRQoL. PCS was effectively predicted using a simple GBT structure with high accuracy (MAE=5.53, RMSE=45.70, MAPE=0.102), while MCS required more complex modelling (130 trees). RF outperformed GBT for MCS prediction (RMSE=83.96 vs. 98.02; MAPE=0.180 vs. 0.198). Variable importance analysis revealed that safety was the strongest predictor of PCS, while life satisfaction (SWLS) and physical activity (IPAQ) were the most influential for MCS. In both models, sex and training frequency were the least significant predictors.

Conclusions. Machine learning approaches provide valuable tools for predicting HRQoL among students in challenging contexts. The findings confirm that physical well-being is strongly influenced by environmental safety, whereas mental well-being depends more on subjective life satisfaction and physical activity. These results highlight the need for integrated health-enhancing recreational programs combining physical activity with psychosocial support and safety measures in Ukrainian universities during wartime.

References

Abegaz, T.M., Ahmed, M., Ali, A.A., & Bhagavathula, A.S. (2025). Predicting health-related quality of life using social determinants of health: A machine learning approach with the All of Us cohort. Bioengineering, 12(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020166

Andrieieva, O., Byshevets, N., & Grygus, I. (2023). Changes in physical activity indicators of Ukrainian students in the conditions of distance education. Physical Rehabilitation and Recreational Health Technologies, 8(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2023-8(2).01

Andrieieva, O., Byshevets, N., & Korzh, N. (2025). Rapid diagnosis of stress-related states to guide health-enhancing physical activity for university students. Physical Rehabilitation and Recreational Health Technologies, 10(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2025-10(2).04

Andrieieva, O., Maltsev, D., & Horodinska, I. (2022). Relationship between quality of life and level of physical activity and family well-being. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 22(4), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2022.4.16

Byshevets, N., Andrieieva, O., & Zaitsev, V. (2023). Prediction of stress-related conditions in students and their prevention through health-enhancing recreational physical activity. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(117), 937–943. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.04117

Hakman, A., Bezverkhnia, H., & Moskalenko, N. (2020). Dynamics of the physical fitness and circumference sizes of body parts as a motivation for self-improvement and self-control in students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.01015

Kljajević, V., Stanković, M., & Sporiš, G. (2022). Physical activity and physical fitness among university students: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010158

Lam, E.T.C., Zhang, J.J., & Jensen, B.E. (2005). Service Quality Assessment Scale (SQAS): An Instrument for Evaluating Service Quality of Health-Fitness Clubs. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9(2), 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0902_2

Maltsev, D., Andrieieva, O., & Prusik, K. (2022). Assessment of the quality of active family leisure. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 22(3), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2022.3.13

Obray, E., Nelson, R., Furman, N., & Bell, S. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of a Recreational Therapy and Rock Climbing Program on Resilience and Self-Efficacy in College Students. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Education and Leadership, 16(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2024-12193

Oparina, E., Kaiser, C., Gentile, N., et al. (2025). Machine learning in the prediction of human wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 15, 1632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84137-1

Pang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2022). Revealing the inner relevance of college students’ physical fitness by association analysis and neural network. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Article ID 1234567. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1234567

Petrachkov, O., Yarmak, O., & Shostak, R. (2023). The effect of stress factors on cognitive and management functions of cadets of higher military educational institutions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23, 162-169. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.01020

Ramón-Arbués, E., Gea-Caballero, V., Granada-López, J. M., et al. (2022). Quality of life and physical activity in university students: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 4226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074226

Raoof, N. (2025). Machine learning models in enhancing prediction of health-related indices among older adults: A scoping review. Heliyon, 11(12), e43510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43510

Rhodes, R. E., Beauchamp, M. R., & Blanchard, C. M. (2025). Effect of recreational sport and physical activity participation on well-being during early parenthood: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 59(1), kaae081. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaae081

Schramlová, M., Řasová, K., & Cortés-Amaro, S. (2024). Quality of life and quality of education among physiotherapy students in Europe. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1344028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1344028

Stelter, M., Zupanic, M., Taetz-Harrer, A., et al. (2025). The impact of the war in Ukraine on the well-being of German medical students: A mixed-methods study. Scientific Reports, 15, 28646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86861-8

Steinacker, J.M., Mechelen, W.V., & Bloch, W. (2023). Global alliance for the promotion of physical activity: The Hamburg Declaration. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 9, e001626. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001626

WHOQOL Group. (2020). WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life. World Health Organization.

Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Predicting quality of life with machine learning: A review of applications in health and psychology. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 9, 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100242

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Andrieieva, O., Byshevets, N., Vindyk, A., Stepanuk, V., & Khrypko, I. (2025). Prediction of quality of life parameters among university students for the optimization of health-enhancing recreational programs. Physical Rehabilitation and Recreational Health Technologies, 10(5), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2025-10(5).01

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Article